Governance and transparency in EU media markets as indicators of press freedom in the digital age
Main Article Content
Abstract
The EU has just passed the European Media Freedom Act (EMFA), the first press law in the region. This piece of legislation aims to address some risks that threaten press freedom in EU media markets in the digital environment through transparency and governance standards related to quality information, editorial integrity, and press freedom. These standards have been also developed by a number of private self-regulation initiatives.
This article provides an analysis of transparency and governance in six EU media markets considering seven standards that are common in these private self-regulation initiatives and have been incorporated into the EMFA: transparency in ownership, governance, funding transparency, labeling, corrections, verification processes, and editorial autonomy.
Specifically, we first analyze the Austrian, German, French, Italian, British, and Spanish markets using these indicators and then assess the results through the theoretical framework of Hallin and Mancini (2004). The article suggests, for example, that the German market, typical of the corporatist democratic model of Central and Northern Europe, poses a lower risk to media pluralism than the Spanish market, which is an example of the polarized Mediterranean model. We believe that this analysis is useful in the current regulatory context of the EMFA.
Downloads
Article Details
How to Cite
Issue
Section

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
© Asamblea de Madrid. Los originales publicados son propiedad de la Asamblea de Madrid, siendo necesario citar la procedencia en cualquier reproducción parcial o total.
References
BROGI, E. y CARLINI, R. (2020). Monitoring Media Pluralism in the Digital Era: Application of the Media Pluralism Monitor in the European Union, Albania and Turkey in the years 2018-2019. Country report: Italy.
BROGI, E. et al. (2018). Monitoring Media Pluralism in Europe: Application of the Media Pluralism Monitor 2017 in the European Union, FYROM, Serbia & Turkey.
CHAUVET, S. (2020). Media Market Risk Ratings: France.
CRAUFURD SMITH, R., KLIMKIEWICZ, B. y OSTLING, A. (2021). Media ownership transparency in Europe: Closing the gap between European aspiration and domestic reality, European Journal of Communication, 36, 547-562. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323121999523
CRAUFURD SMITH, R. (2020). Monitoring Media Pluralism in the Digital Era: Application of the Media Pluralism Monitor in the European Union, Albania and Turkey in the years 2018-2019. Country Report: UK.
European Commission. (2020). Rule of Law Report. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52020DC0580&from=EN
GARCÍA GRAÑA, G., GRASSLER, M. y VEDEL, T. (2020). Monitoring Media Pluralism in the Digital Era: Application of the Media Pluralism Monitor in the European Union, Albania and Turkey in the years 2018-2019. Country report: France.
HERRERO-BEAUMONT, E. (2022) Emerging Transparency Systems for News Governance to Protect Media Independence and Credibility in the Digital Infosphere, Communication Law and Policy, 27:3-4, 220-249, DOI: 10.1080/10811680.2022.2154071
HALLIN, D. C. y MANCINI, P. (2004). Comparing Media Systems: Three Models of Media and Politics, Cambridge University Press.
HOLDER, P. et al. (2023). Paying for News: What Google and Meta Owe US Publishers—Draft Working Paper. The Initiative for Policy Dialogue. https://policydialogue.org/publications/working-papers/paying-for-news-what-google-and-meta-owe-us-publishers-draft-working-paper/
HOLZNAGEL, B. y KALBHENN, J. (2020). Monitoring Media Pluralism in the Digital Era: Application of the Media Pluralism Monitor in the European Union, Albania and Turkey in the years 2018-2019. Country report: Germany.
ISAAC, M., ROBERTSON, K. y GRANT, N. (2023) Silicon Valley Ditches News, Shaking an Unstable Industry. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2023/10/19/technology/news-social-media-traffic.html
KROPSHOFER, K. y RINGLER, V. (2020) Media Integrity Report Fundación HAZ, 112-135.
LÄMMERHIRT, D. (2020). Media market risk ratings: Germany.
MENAPACE, A. y DELLE CESE, F., (2020) Media Integrity Report. Fundación HAZ, 85-110.
NIELSEN, R. K., ESSER, F. y LEVY, D. (2013). Comparative Perspectives on the Changing Business of Journalism and Its Implications for Democracy, The International Journal of Press/Politics, 18(4), 383-391. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161213497130
SEETHALER, J. y BEAUFORT, M. (2020). Monitoring Media Pluralism in the Digital Era: Application of the Media Pluralism Monitor in the European Union, Albania and Turkey in the years 2018-2019. Country Report: Austria.
VILLAVERDE, I. (1994) Estado democrático e información. El derecho a ser informado y la Constitución Española de 1978. Junta General del Principado de Asturias.
WRIGHT, L. (2020). Risk assessment: UK Media Market.